+46.2%
SLB vs UMAC
+2.9%
+43.3%
-22.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -10.9% | +9.8% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -4.1% | -26.0% | +22.0% | -3.4% |
| 30D | +2.5% | -40.3% | +42.9% | +3.8% |
| 3M | +2.0% | -51.1% | +53.1% | +3.5% |
| 6M | -6.3% | -5.6% | -0.7% | -7.0% |
| YTD | +36.5% | +2.3% | +34.3% | +30.2% |
| 1Y | +46.2% | +7.9% | +38.4% | +39.7% |
| All | +46.2% | +2.9% | +43.3% | +39.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling