+82.0%
RPRX vs UMAC
+2.9%
+79.1%
-12.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -10.9% | +12.6% | +1.7% |
| 7D | +4.2% | -26.0% | +30.3% | +4.1% |
| 30D | +19.2% | -40.3% | +59.5% | +19.1% |
| 3M | +18.0% | -51.1% | +69.2% | +17.9% |
| 6M | +35.7% | -5.6% | +41.4% | +34.8% |
| YTD | +77.2% | +2.3% | +75.0% | +74.7% |
| 1Y | +82.0% | +7.9% | +74.1% | +79.1% |
| All | +82.0% | +2.9% | +79.1% | +79.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling