+141.7%
RNG vs VICR
+272.1%
-130.4%
-29.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | VICR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.9% | +5.5% | -9.4% | -3.8% |
| 7D | +5.8% | +0.4% | +5.4% | +5.8% |
| 30D | +19.6% | -13.9% | +33.6% | +19.3% |
| 3M | +67.0% | -38.4% | +105.4% | +68.1% |
| 6M | +88.4% | -7.2% | +95.6% | +81.3% |
| YTD | +155.5% | +72.0% | +83.4% | +123.7% |
| 1Y | +141.7% | +263.3% | -121.6% | +87.8% |
| All | +141.7% | +272.1% | -130.4% | +87.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VICR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VICR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VICR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VICR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling