+185.3%
RNG vs BIIB
+68.6%
+116.7%
-29.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +2.2% | -2.5% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -9.6% | +4.3% | -13.8% | -10.2% |
| 30D | -1.4% | +13.8% | -15.2% | -3.8% |
| 3M | +28.8% | +22.1% | +6.7% | +24.2% |
| 6M | +65.6% | +35.9% | +29.7% | +56.7% |
| YTD | +171.4% | +44.6% | +126.8% | +149.0% |
| 1Y | +185.3% | +70.4% | +114.9% | +150.6% |
| All | +185.3% | +68.6% | +116.7% | +150.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling