+13.3%
RMBS vs UMAC
+164.0%
-150.7%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -3.1% | +4.4% | +1.9% |
| 7D | -0.3% | -0.9% | +0.6% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -12.2% | -7.7% | -4.5% | -11.9% |
| 3M | -49.5% | -26.4% | -23.1% | -48.6% |
| 6M | -7.1% | +61.9% | -69.0% | -20.0% |
| YTD | -7.0% | +86.5% | -93.5% | -24.9% |
| 1Y | +13.3% | +156.3% | -143.0% | -8.5% |
| All | +13.3% | +164.0% | -150.7% | -8.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling