+13.3%
RMBS vs GTLB
+14.4%
-1.1%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +1.1% | +0.3% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -0.3% | +11.1% | -11.4% | -0.6% |
| 30D | -12.2% | +37.8% | -50.0% | -13.0% |
| 3M | -49.5% | +61.6% | -111.1% | -50.1% |
| 6M | -7.1% | +98.9% | -106.1% | -9.7% |
| YTD | -7.0% | +32.8% | -39.8% | +1.6% |
| 1Y | +13.3% | +14.7% | -1.3% | +35.1% |
| All | +13.3% | +14.4% | -1.1% | +35.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling