-26.6%
RKT vs UMC
+209.4%
-236.0%
-47.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | +4.6% | -5.7% | -1.7% |
| 7D | +2.1% | +5.0% | -2.8% | +1.4% |
| 30D | +1.4% | +7.7% | -6.2% | +0.4% |
| 3M | +6.3% | +1.7% | +4.6% | +4.3% |
| 6M | -15.5% | +113.9% | -129.4% | -23.9% |
| YTD | -27.4% | +168.9% | -196.3% | -36.2% |
| 1Y | -26.6% | +207.2% | -233.8% | -36.0% |
| All | -26.6% | +209.4% | -236.0% | -36.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling