-68.1%
RGTI vs NIO
-54.1%
-14.0%
-71.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | +3.4% | -2.3% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -9.6% | -0.6% | -9.0% | -9.3% |
| 30D | -26.0% | -3.5% | -22.5% | -24.7% |
| 3M | -35.8% | -30.7% | -5.1% | -24.6% |
| 6M | -36.7% | -45.6% | +9.0% | -18.6% |
| YTD | -49.4% | -35.3% | -14.1% | -39.6% |
| 1Y | -68.1% | -53.9% | -14.2% | -41.9% |
| All | -68.1% | -54.1% | -14.0% | -41.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling