+39.0%
RGEN vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+138.9%
-40.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -3.8% | +2.6% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -4.9% | -8.0% | +3.1% | -4.9% |
| 30D | +5.7% | -27.9% | +33.6% | +5.7% |
| 3M | +32.4% | -74.6% | +107.0% | +33.6% |
| 6M | +33.2% | -99.5% | +132.6% | +30.0% |
| YTD | +2.3% | -99.7% | +102.0% | +2.7% |
| 1Y | +39.0% | -99.9% | +138.9% | +46.0% |
| All | +39.0% | -99.9% | +138.9% | +46.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling