-45.7%
RDDT vs UMAC
+2.9%
-48.7%
-64.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.0% | -10.9% | +16.8% | +7.5% |
| 7D | -24.4% | -26.0% | +1.7% | -20.7% |
| 30D | -32.3% | -40.3% | +8.0% | -27.2% |
| 3M | -36.3% | -51.1% | +14.8% | -30.1% |
| 6M | -39.7% | -5.6% | -34.1% | -39.2% |
| YTD | -55.7% | +2.3% | -58.0% | -56.3% |
| 1Y | -45.7% | +7.9% | -53.6% | -46.5% |
| All | -45.7% | +2.9% | -48.7% | -46.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling