+196.2%
RDDT vs LII
-20.0%
+216.2%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1990-01-01 to 2026-09-08.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | -1.4% | -1.9% | -2.8% |
| 7D | +3.3% | +2.1% | +1.2% | +2.5% |
| 30D | -7.6% | -12.4% | +4.8% | -3.3% |
| 3M | -12.7% | -24.8% | +12.1% | -5.3% |
| 6M | +7.2% | -25.2% | +32.3% | +15.5% |
| YTD | -35.0% | -20.3% | -14.8% | -32.6% |
| 1Y | -35.0% | -32.9% | -2.1% | -27.6% |
| All | +196.2% | -20.0% | +216.2% | +182.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1990-01-01 to 2026-09-08: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1990-01-01 to 2026-09-08 analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling