-52.2%
RDDT vs IEMG
+7.4%
-59.6%
-64.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | IEMG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.9% | -5.6% | -2.3% | -3.6% |
| 7D | -27.6% | -7.4% | -20.2% | -22.6% |
| 30D | -37.0% | -14.9% | -22.2% | -29.3% |
| 3M | -39.6% | -11.6% | -28.0% | -33.8% |
| 6M | -45.3% | -11.1% | -34.3% | -41.3% |
| YTD | -59.2% | +6.0% | -65.2% | -65.3% |
| 1Y | -52.2% | +6.5% | -58.7% | -58.9% |
| All | -52.2% | +7.4% | -59.6% | -58.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IEMG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IEMG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IEMG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IEMG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling