-35.4%
RBLX vs AMC
-97.9%
+62.4%
-82.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -4.1% | +4.9% | +1.3% |
| 7D | +8.1% | -7.1% | +15.2% | +9.1% |
| 30D | +23.9% | -1.7% | +25.6% | +24.0% |
| 3M | +8.1% | +13.5% | -5.3% | +4.4% |
| 6M | -23.7% | +112.6% | -136.3% | -33.4% |
| YTD | -44.6% | +51.3% | -95.9% | -49.6% |
| 1Y | -66.2% | -14.5% | -51.7% | -66.8% |
| 3Y | +54.7% | -67.1% | +121.8% | +58.5% |
| 5Y | -48.9% | -99.5% | +50.6% | -21.9% |
| All | -35.4% | -97.9% | +62.4% | -17.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10 analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling