-35.3%
QXO vs UMC
+209.4%
-244.8%
-52.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | +4.6% | -5.4% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -1.3% | +5.0% | -6.2% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -16.0% | +7.7% | -23.7% | -17.3% |
| 3M | -17.7% | +1.7% | -19.4% | -19.3% |
| 6M | -42.6% | +113.9% | -156.5% | -49.9% |
| YTD | -30.8% | +168.9% | -199.7% | -38.2% |
| 1Y | -35.3% | +207.2% | -242.5% | -38.9% |
| All | -35.3% | +209.4% | -244.8% | -38.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling