+43.8%
QLD vs UMC
+209.4%
-165.6%
-25.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +4.6% | -4.3% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +0.6% | +5.0% | -4.4% | -1.0% |
| 30D | -0.1% | +7.7% | -7.8% | -2.6% |
| 3M | -8.4% | +1.7% | -10.0% | -9.7% |
| 6M | +32.2% | +113.9% | -81.7% | +9.4% |
| YTD | +28.9% | +168.9% | -140.0% | -3.7% |
| 1Y | +43.8% | +207.2% | -163.4% | +3.0% |
| All | +43.8% | +209.4% | -165.6% | +3.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling