+7.9%
QCOM vs UMAC
+164.0%
-156.1%
-41.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -3.1% | +3.2% | +0.4% |
| 7D | +3.3% | -0.9% | +4.2% | +3.4% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -7.7% | +15.4% | +7.8% |
| 3M | -30.1% | -26.4% | -3.6% | -29.0% |
| 6M | +22.8% | +61.9% | -39.0% | +12.9% |
| YTD | +0.2% | +86.5% | -86.3% | -11.1% |
| 1Y | +7.9% | +156.3% | -148.5% | -3.4% |
| All | +7.9% | +164.0% | -156.1% | -3.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling