+9.3%
PLD vs ALHC
-51.4%
+60.7%
-16.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | +10.1% | -8.4% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +4.9% | -0.5% | +5.4% | +4.9% |
| 30D | +2.6% | -4.2% | +6.8% | +2.6% |
| 3M | -4.8% | -39.8% | +35.0% | -2.1% |
| 6M | -3.9% | -57.7% | +53.8% | -0.8% |
| YTD | +5.3% | -58.8% | +64.1% | +6.5% |
| 1Y | +9.3% | -52.4% | +61.6% | +9.4% |
| All | +9.3% | -51.4% | +60.7% | +9.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling