+28.2%
PH vs GFS
+37.2%
-9.0%
-19.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GFS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +1.5% | -1.7% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -3.1% | +1.0% | -4.1% | -3.2% |
| 30D | -3.2% | -8.6% | +5.3% | -2.2% |
| 3M | +10.6% | -46.5% | +57.1% | +19.3% |
| 6M | -2.1% | -4.8% | +2.7% | -5.6% |
| YTD | +10.2% | +29.7% | -19.5% | +0.5% |
| 1Y | +28.2% | +35.8% | -7.6% | +15.7% |
| All | +28.2% | +37.2% | -9.0% | +15.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GFS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GFS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GFS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GFS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling