+17.0%
PG vs NTAP
+66.6%
-49.6%
-15.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.2% | -1.6% | +4.9% | +3.1% |
| 7D | +5.7% | -16.1% | +21.8% | +4.1% |
| 30D | +15.4% | -15.9% | +31.4% | +13.8% |
| 3M | +13.8% | -1.2% | +15.0% | +13.6% |
| 6M | +18.3% | +70.1% | -51.7% | +23.2% |
| YTD | +20.1% | +77.9% | -57.8% | +25.7% |
| 1Y | +17.0% | +68.1% | -51.1% | +20.8% |
| All | +17.0% | +66.6% | -49.6% | +20.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling