-28.0%
ORCL vs UMAC
+164.0%
-192.0%
-64.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.1% | -3.1% | +6.1% | +3.6% |
| 7D | +5.3% | -0.9% | +6.2% | +5.4% |
| 30D | +10.0% | -7.7% | +17.6% | +10.1% |
| 3M | -32.6% | -26.4% | -6.1% | -31.2% |
| 6M | +4.9% | +61.9% | -56.9% | -9.8% |
| YTD | -17.8% | +86.5% | -104.3% | -32.5% |
| 1Y | -28.0% | +156.3% | -184.3% | -50.0% |
| All | -28.0% | +164.0% | -192.0% | -50.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling