+162.9%
ONTO vs SMTC
+154.8%
+8.1%
-42.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | SMTC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | +9.2% | -3.1% | +0.8% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +12.7% | -13.8% | -7.7% |
| 30D | -2.9% | +22.0% | -24.9% | -14.4% |
| 3M | -2.5% | -12.7% | +10.2% | +3.0% |
| 6M | +28.2% | +64.8% | -36.6% | -0.5% |
| YTD | +69.8% | +100.7% | -30.9% | +21.5% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | +146.9% | +16.0% | +85.9% |
| All | +162.9% | +154.8% | +8.1% | +85.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SMTC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SMTC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SMTC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SMTC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling