+162.9%
ONTO vs BIIB
+55.8%
+107.1%
-42.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | -1.6% | +7.8% | +6.0% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +1.1% | -2.1% | -1.0% |
| 30D | -2.9% | +6.9% | -9.8% | -2.4% |
| 3M | -2.5% | +12.4% | -14.9% | -2.2% |
| 6M | +28.2% | +16.3% | +11.9% | +28.1% |
| YTD | +69.8% | +25.5% | +44.3% | +67.5% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | +57.8% | +105.1% | +145.1% |
| All | +162.9% | +55.8% | +107.1% | +145.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling