-39.2%
ONON vs UMAC
+164.0%
-203.2%
-45.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | -3.1% | +1.8% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -3.0% | -0.9% | -2.1% | -3.0% |
| 30D | -26.7% | -7.7% | -19.1% | -26.5% |
| 3M | -25.3% | -26.4% | +1.1% | -24.7% |
| 6M | -35.3% | +61.9% | -97.1% | -36.6% |
| YTD | -39.8% | +86.5% | -126.3% | -41.7% |
| 1Y | -39.2% | +156.3% | -195.5% | -43.1% |
| All | -39.2% | +164.0% | -203.2% | -43.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling