+23.9%
OMC vs TNA
+37.5%
-13.5%
-17.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TNA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.2% | +4.4% | +0.8% | +4.8% |
| 7D | +12.5% | +2.4% | +10.1% | +12.2% |
| 30D | +16.3% | -0.9% | +17.2% | +16.2% |
| 3M | +8.1% | -19.2% | +27.3% | +10.0% |
| 6M | +17.2% | -0.8% | +18.0% | +16.4% |
| YTD | +11.8% | +33.2% | -21.4% | +8.7% |
| 1Y | +23.9% | +38.5% | -14.6% | +20.5% |
| All | +23.9% | +37.5% | -13.5% | +20.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TNA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TNA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TNA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TNA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling