+70.9%
NVT vs TRGP
+80.7%
-9.8%
-27.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -1.2% | +3.8% | +2.5% |
| 7D | +5.1% | +0.8% | +4.3% | +5.1% |
| 30D | -3.7% | +11.5% | -15.2% | -3.1% |
| 3M | -10.1% | +9.0% | -19.1% | -9.5% |
| 6M | +37.5% | +20.5% | +17.0% | +38.1% |
| YTD | +53.7% | +59.5% | -5.8% | +50.1% |
| 1Y | +70.9% | +77.9% | -7.0% | +63.1% |
| All | +70.9% | +80.7% | -9.8% | +63.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling