+70.9%
NVT vs SCHG
+16.6%
+54.2%
-27.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | SCHG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -0.9% | +3.5% | +3.7% |
| 7D | +5.1% | -0.7% | +5.8% | +6.0% |
| 30D | -3.7% | +0.2% | -3.9% | -4.2% |
| 3M | -10.1% | +2.2% | -12.4% | -12.8% |
| 6M | +37.5% | +15.0% | +22.4% | +13.7% |
| YTD | +53.7% | +9.2% | +44.6% | +37.2% |
| 1Y | +70.9% | +15.7% | +55.1% | +42.2% |
| All | +70.9% | +16.6% | +54.2% | +42.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SCHG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SCHG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SCHG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SCHG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling