+70.9%
NVT vs PFGC
-5.1%
+76.0%
-27.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -0.5% | +3.1% | +2.6% |
| 7D | +5.1% | -2.2% | +7.3% | +5.2% |
| 30D | -3.7% | -11.9% | +8.2% | -3.4% |
| 3M | -10.1% | +5.0% | -15.2% | -12.6% |
| 6M | +37.5% | +8.6% | +28.9% | +31.5% |
| YTD | +53.7% | +9.7% | +44.0% | +49.8% |
| 1Y | +70.9% | -6.3% | +77.2% | +64.3% |
| All | +70.9% | -5.1% | +76.0% | +64.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling