+70.9%
NVT vs GFS
+37.2%
+33.7%
-27.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GFS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +1.5% | +1.1% | +2.0% |
| 7D | +5.1% | +1.0% | +4.1% | +4.7% |
| 30D | -3.7% | -8.6% | +4.9% | -0.5% |
| 3M | -10.1% | -46.5% | +36.4% | +12.7% |
| 6M | +37.5% | -4.8% | +42.3% | +42.6% |
| YTD | +53.7% | +29.7% | +24.1% | +46.6% |
| 1Y | +70.9% | +35.8% | +35.0% | +63.4% |
| All | +70.9% | +37.2% | +33.7% | +63.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GFS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GFS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GFS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GFS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling