+70.9%
NVT vs CLBK
+73.3%
-2.4%
-27.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLBK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | 0.0% | +2.6% | +2.6% |
| 7D | +5.1% | +1.2% | +3.9% | +5.0% |
| 30D | -3.7% | +9.1% | -12.8% | -4.2% |
| 3M | -10.1% | +27.7% | -37.8% | -11.5% |
| 6M | +37.5% | +40.8% | -3.4% | +33.2% |
| YTD | +53.7% | +66.4% | -12.7% | +47.4% |
| 1Y | +70.9% | +72.4% | -1.5% | +64.8% |
| All | +70.9% | +73.3% | -2.4% | +64.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLBK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLBK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLBK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLBK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling