+70.9%
NVT vs BLDR
-52.1%
+122.9%
-27.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +2.5% | +0.1% | +2.2% |
| 7D | +5.1% | -2.8% | +7.9% | +5.6% |
| 30D | -3.7% | -13.3% | +9.6% | -1.4% |
| 3M | -10.1% | -12.3% | +2.1% | -8.6% |
| 6M | +37.5% | -31.5% | +68.9% | +45.3% |
| YTD | +53.7% | -36.1% | +89.8% | +62.7% |
| 1Y | +70.9% | -54.1% | +124.9% | +94.4% |
| All | +70.9% | -52.1% | +122.9% | +94.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling