+70.9%
NVT vs BIIB
+55.8%
+15.1%
-27.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -1.6% | +4.2% | +2.5% |
| 7D | +5.1% | +1.1% | +4.0% | +5.1% |
| 30D | -3.7% | +6.9% | -10.6% | -3.4% |
| 3M | -10.1% | +12.4% | -22.6% | -10.2% |
| 6M | +37.5% | +16.3% | +21.2% | +36.6% |
| YTD | +53.7% | +25.5% | +28.3% | +51.1% |
| 1Y | +70.9% | +57.8% | +13.1% | +62.2% |
| All | +70.9% | +55.8% | +15.1% | +62.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling