+34.4%
NVDA vs ZTS
-49.3%
+83.7%
-20.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -0.6% | +1.5% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +5.9% | -2.0% | +7.9% | +5.7% |
| 30D | +5.1% | +1.9% | +3.2% | +5.2% |
| 3M | +5.4% | -4.0% | +9.4% | +5.6% |
| 6M | +26.0% | -39.1% | +65.1% | +30.2% |
| YTD | +23.7% | -38.8% | +62.5% | +27.6% |
| 1Y | +34.4% | -49.6% | +83.9% | +45.8% |
| All | +34.4% | -49.3% | +83.7% | +45.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling