+87.8%
NUE vs LSCC
+57.8%
+30.0%
-18.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | +1.3% | -3.3% | -2.2% |
| 7D | -1.4% | +3.0% | -4.4% | -1.9% |
| 30D | +6.6% | -19.3% | +25.8% | +9.5% |
| 3M | -2.0% | -22.3% | +20.3% | +0.9% |
| 6M | +19.2% | -14.6% | +33.8% | +19.6% |
| YTD | +65.6% | +45.8% | +19.8% | +50.2% |
| 1Y | +87.8% | +69.6% | +18.2% | +68.3% |
| All | +87.8% | +57.8% | +30.0% | +68.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling