+48.1%
NTRS vs ALHC
-16.6%
+64.7%
-12.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +0.4% | -0.6% | +1.0% | +0.4% |
| 30D | +1.7% | -1.0% | +2.7% | +1.7% |
| 3M | +8.9% | -10.2% | +19.0% | +8.2% |
| 6M | +30.6% | -28.3% | +58.9% | +32.6% |
| YTD | +38.7% | -31.4% | +70.1% | +40.6% |
| 1Y | +48.1% | -16.9% | +65.0% | +46.4% |
| All | +48.1% | -16.6% | +64.7% | +46.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling