+97.0%
NTRA vs PFGC
-5.1%
+102.1%
-28.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -0.5% | +0.7% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +0.6% | -2.2% | +2.8% | +0.9% |
| 30D | +19.5% | -11.9% | +31.4% | +21.9% |
| 3M | +47.8% | +5.0% | +42.8% | +45.5% |
| 6M | +61.6% | +8.6% | +53.0% | +56.8% |
| YTD | +43.3% | +9.7% | +33.6% | +42.9% |
| 1Y | +97.0% | -6.3% | +103.3% | +95.0% |
| All | +97.0% | -5.1% | +102.1% | +95.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling