+97.0%
NTRA vs EPAM
-32.1%
+129.2%
-28.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -2.4% | +2.5% | +0.7% |
| 7D | +0.6% | +2.0% | -1.4% | +0.1% |
| 30D | +19.5% | +6.5% | +13.0% | +16.8% |
| 3M | +47.8% | +19.9% | +27.8% | +40.5% |
| 6M | +61.6% | -16.9% | +78.6% | +67.6% |
| YTD | +43.3% | -42.9% | +86.1% | +59.7% |
| 1Y | +97.0% | -30.4% | +127.4% | +113.0% |
| All | +97.0% | -32.1% | +129.2% | +113.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling