+37.6%
NTR vs PENG
+120.5%
-82.9%
-27.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.0% | -9.1% | +13.1% | +3.8% |
| 7D | +4.3% | -20.5% | +24.8% | +4.2% |
| 30D | +2.6% | -20.4% | +22.9% | +2.3% |
| 3M | +8.5% | -16.4% | +24.9% | +8.2% |
| 6M | -3.3% | +49.2% | -52.6% | -3.5% |
| YTD | +19.6% | +147.2% | -127.6% | +17.7% |
| 1Y | +37.6% | +124.7% | -87.1% | +35.9% |
| All | +37.6% | +120.5% | -82.9% | +35.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling