+37.6%
NTR vs ALHC
-51.4%
+89.0%
-27.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.0% | +10.1% | -6.2% | +4.1% |
| 7D | +4.3% | -0.5% | +4.8% | +4.3% |
| 30D | +2.6% | -4.2% | +6.8% | +2.5% |
| 3M | +8.5% | -39.8% | +48.3% | +7.1% |
| 6M | -3.3% | -57.7% | +54.4% | -4.5% |
| YTD | +19.6% | -58.8% | +78.4% | +18.2% |
| 1Y | +37.6% | -52.4% | +90.0% | +35.0% |
| All | +37.6% | -51.4% | +89.0% | +35.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling