+37.6%
NTR vs ABCL
+138.2%
-100.6%
-27.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.0% | +0.8% | +3.1% | +4.0% |
| 7D | +4.3% | -10.0% | +14.3% | +4.3% |
| 30D | +2.6% | -10.9% | +13.5% | +2.6% |
| 3M | +8.5% | +101.6% | -93.1% | +9.1% |
| 6M | -3.3% | +167.5% | -170.9% | -1.4% |
| YTD | +19.6% | +259.1% | -239.5% | +21.3% |
| 1Y | +37.6% | +152.2% | -114.5% | +41.5% |
| All | +37.6% | +138.2% | -100.6% | +41.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling