+58.9%
NTAP vs RGEN
+45.2%
+13.7%
-24.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | RGEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -1.2% | +1.3% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -4.9% | +4.2% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -0.5% | +5.7% | -6.2% | -1.4% |
| 3M | +4.1% | +32.4% | -28.4% | -1.0% |
| 6M | +88.0% | +33.2% | +54.8% | +77.7% |
| YTD | +75.6% | +2.3% | +73.3% | +74.5% |
| 1Y | +58.9% | +39.0% | +19.9% | +54.9% |
| All | +58.9% | +45.2% | +13.7% | +54.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RGEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RGEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RGEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RGEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling