+58.9%
NTAP vs LH
+20.0%
+38.9%
-24.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -1.4% | +1.5% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -2.5% | +1.7% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -0.5% | +4.3% | -4.9% | -1.4% |
| 3M | +4.1% | +25.5% | -21.5% | -0.5% |
| 6M | +88.0% | +17.0% | +71.0% | +83.0% |
| YTD | +75.6% | +31.3% | +44.3% | +68.0% |
| 1Y | +58.9% | +20.0% | +38.9% | +51.9% |
| All | +58.9% | +20.0% | +38.9% | +51.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling