+58.9%
NTAP vs GPN
+8.1%
+50.9%
-24.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GPN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +0.8% | -0.7% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +0.8% | -1.5% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -0.5% | +5.8% | -6.3% | -1.8% |
| 3M | +4.1% | +37.0% | -32.9% | -3.6% |
| 6M | +88.0% | +20.1% | +67.8% | +80.3% |
| YTD | +75.6% | +20.4% | +55.2% | +68.1% |
| 1Y | +58.9% | +7.4% | +51.5% | +57.3% |
| All | +58.9% | +8.1% | +50.9% | +57.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GPN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GPN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GPN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GPN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling