+68.1%
NTAP vs GD
+9.0%
+59.1%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -2.6% | +0.9% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -16.1% | +3.0% | -19.1% | -16.4% |
| 30D | -15.9% | +10.5% | -26.5% | -17.2% |
| 3M | -1.2% | -5.0% | +3.7% | +0.3% |
| 6M | +70.1% | +5.5% | +64.6% | +70.1% |
| YTD | +77.9% | +10.3% | +67.6% | +78.5% |
| 1Y | +68.1% | +8.2% | +60.0% | +70.0% |
| All | +68.1% | +9.0% | +59.1% | +70.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling