+68.1%
NTAP vs FLUT
-63.1%
+131.3%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLUT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -2.3% | +0.7% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -16.1% | +4.2% | -20.2% | -16.4% |
| 30D | -15.9% | +8.0% | -23.9% | -16.5% |
| 3M | -1.2% | -22.1% | +20.8% | +1.2% |
| 6M | +70.1% | -21.7% | +91.8% | +72.7% |
| YTD | +77.9% | -62.0% | +139.9% | +101.3% |
| 1Y | +68.1% | -63.2% | +131.3% | +90.8% |
| All | +68.1% | -63.1% | +131.3% | +90.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLUT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLUT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLUT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLUT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling