+58.9%
NTAP vs EOSE
-49.1%
+108.0%
-24.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EOSE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +10.9% | -10.7% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +19.0% | -19.8% | -1.6% |
| 30D | -0.5% | +1.6% | -2.1% | -0.8% |
| 3M | +4.1% | -52.0% | +56.1% | +6.9% |
| 6M | +88.0% | -42.5% | +130.5% | +89.8% |
| YTD | +75.6% | -66.1% | +141.7% | +80.1% |
| 1Y | +58.9% | -47.1% | +106.1% | +66.8% |
| All | +58.9% | -49.1% | +108.0% | +66.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EOSE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EOSE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EOSE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EOSE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling