+58.9%
NTAP vs CG
-24.3%
+83.2%
-24.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -1.6% | +1.7% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -4.3% | +3.6% | +0.4% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -5.1% | +4.5% | +0.7% |
| 3M | +4.1% | +8.7% | -4.6% | +1.4% |
| 6M | +88.0% | -9.2% | +97.2% | +91.4% |
| YTD | +75.6% | -18.9% | +94.4% | +87.5% |
| 1Y | +58.9% | -25.6% | +84.6% | +71.4% |
| All | +58.9% | -24.3% | +83.2% | +71.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling