+58.9%
NTAP vs BIIB
+55.8%
+3.2%
-24.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -1.6% | +1.8% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +1.1% | -1.8% | -0.8% |
| 30D | -0.5% | +6.9% | -7.4% | -0.7% |
| 3M | +4.1% | +12.4% | -8.3% | +2.7% |
| 6M | +88.0% | +16.3% | +71.7% | +83.5% |
| YTD | +75.6% | +25.5% | +50.1% | +66.7% |
| 1Y | +58.9% | +57.8% | +1.1% | +46.2% |
| All | +58.9% | +55.8% | +3.2% | +46.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling