+68.1%
NTAP vs BIIB
+68.6%
-0.5%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +2.2% | -3.9% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -16.1% | +4.3% | -20.4% | -16.0% |
| 30D | -15.9% | +13.8% | -29.7% | -15.7% |
| 3M | -1.2% | +22.1% | -23.3% | -0.9% |
| 6M | +70.1% | +35.9% | +34.1% | +66.3% |
| YTD | +77.9% | +44.6% | +33.4% | +66.4% |
| 1Y | +68.1% | +70.4% | -2.3% | +44.5% |
| All | +68.1% | +68.6% | -0.5% | +44.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling