+68.1%
NTAP vs BBIO
+26.8%
+41.3%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +5.2% | -6.8% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -16.1% | +10.0% | -26.1% | -15.7% |
| 30D | -15.9% | +17.8% | -33.7% | -15.5% |
| 3M | -1.2% | -5.1% | +3.9% | -0.5% |
| 6M | +70.1% | +12.9% | +57.2% | +73.4% |
| YTD | +77.9% | +1.8% | +76.1% | +81.4% |
| 1Y | +68.1% | +26.9% | +41.2% | +65.6% |
| All | +68.1% | +26.8% | +41.3% | +65.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling