+58.9%
NTAP vs AMC
-2.6%
+61.5%
-24.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +4.3% | -4.2% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +2.3% | -3.1% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -0.7% | +0.2% | -0.5% |
| 3M | +4.1% | +35.2% | -31.1% | +0.6% |
| 6M | +88.0% | +124.6% | -36.6% | +66.7% |
| YTD | +75.6% | +69.9% | +5.7% | +62.3% |
| 1Y | +58.9% | -2.6% | +61.5% | +54.0% |
| All | +58.9% | -2.6% | +61.5% | +54.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling