+19.8%
NSC vs UMAC
+164.0%
-144.2%
-12.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -3.1% | +3.6% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -5.5% | -0.9% | -4.6% | -5.5% |
| 30D | -3.2% | -7.7% | +4.4% | -3.3% |
| 3M | +7.7% | -26.4% | +34.1% | +7.4% |
| 6M | +4.5% | +61.9% | -57.3% | +5.8% |
| YTD | +15.6% | +86.5% | -70.9% | +16.4% |
| 1Y | +19.8% | +156.3% | -136.5% | +20.1% |
| All | +19.8% | +164.0% | -144.2% | +20.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling